간행물

문법교육 update

Grammar Education

  • : 한국문법교육학회
  • : 어문학분야  >  국어학
  • : KCI등재
  • :
  • : 연속간행물
  • : 연3회
  • : 1738-5296
  • : 2713-7503
  • :

수록정보
수록범위 : 1권0호(2004)~42권0호(2021) |수록논문 수 : 413
문법교육
42권0호(2021년 08월) 수록논문
최근 권호 논문
| | | |

KCI등재

1한글 맞춤법 탐구의 실태와 내용 - '사이시옷 표기 규정'을 중심으로 -

저자 : 강보선 ( Kang Bosun )

발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회 간행물 : 문법교육 42권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 1-31 (31 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

The purpose of this study is to specifically prepare content for orthography inquiry. As a result of analyzing the current status of orthography education, orthography was considered as an object of understanding and utilization, but orthography was not well recognized as an object of inquiry. In addition, in this study, when it comes to exploring orthography, 'orthography inquiry' should be a critical inquiry, and content elements of critical inquiry include 'what are the problems of this regulation?' and 'what is suggested as a way to solve the problems of this regulation, and what are the pros and cons of that method?'. Applying this to a inquiry for the 'Saisiot Regulation', 'What is the problem with labeling saisiot differently depending on the type of word?' and 'Pros and cons of marking and not marking Saisiot' were selected as the content elements of the inquiry, and the detailed contents of each were considered.

KCI등재

2김희상의 「초등국어어전」에 대하여

저자 : 고석주 ( Ko Seokju )

발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회 간행물 : 문법교육 42권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 33-58 (26 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This article describes the contents of 「Cho-deung-gug-eo-eo-jeon」, the first approved grammar textbook written by Hee-Sang Kim, who had been educated in Chinese and English for a long time, with the stimulation of English grammar. The first edition was published in 1909, and a revised edition was published in 1910. This article compares and reviews editions, focusing on 「(Revised) Cho-deung-gug-eo-eo-jeon (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3)」, which was published by Yuil Seogwan on February 8, 1910, stored in Sejong University Academic Information Service.
It was confirmed that there is no change in the contents of the first edition and the revised version of Vol. 2, which is currently comparable, but only changes in spelling and examples. Three versions of Vol. 1 is compared and reviewed, and confirmed the possibility that there could be more than two edition. In Vol. 3, the contents of which were first introduced through this article, it is reviewed that most of the contents in 「Joseon Eojeon」 and 「Uligultul」 were presented at the elementary education level, and the content on writing is also presented for elementary education.

KCI등재

3공정언어(PC어) 사례를 활용한 단어 형성 교육 방안 탐색

저자 : 박혜진 ( Park Hyejin )

발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회 간행물 : 문법교육 42권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 59-88 (30 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This work discusses the direction of word-formation education from an onomasiological approach looking at word-formation with a series of cognitive processes following the order of 'target - conceptualization - verbalization'. I also argued that in order for word-formation education to experience the essence of word-formation as a social practice, it is necessary to strengthen the educational content of conceptualization, which is currently alienated from education. In addition, as a sanction to materialize the educational contents of the conceptualization phase, I highlighted the educational significance of the "PC language" and presented examples of activities of word-forming chapter using them.
This study is significant in two ways: First, by materializing the educational contents on the 'conceptualization', it will contribute to realizing word-formation education that balances the entire process of word-formation. Second, we propose educational content that focuses on the phase of semantic, thus contributing to extending word-formation education to the context of 'expression and communication'. In particular, by paying attention to PC language created based on critical perception of language expression as educational sanctions, it will also contribute to increasing the social viability of word-formation education.

KCI등재

4장르 중심 문법교육을 위한 인용표현 기술 방안 연구

저자 : 유혜령 ( Yu Hyeryeong )

발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회 간행물 : 문법교육 42권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 89-129 (41 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This study aimed at exploring the usage aspects of Korean language in various genres and describing genre-based grammar, in order to realize the ideas of genre-based grammar education.
It was well known that teaching form-centered grammar in a normative way was difficult to help learners in actual situation of their communication. This study suggested that the linguistic features varied for each genre should be described in grammar and utilized in productive teaching and learning activities.
Thus, I proposed a method of describing the linguistic features of each genre, by presenting cases of exploring genre variation in quotation expressions using corpus analysis method. The contents of genre-based grammar education described in this way would be used as source knowledges for productive teaching in Korean language education, contributing to expanding the range of learners' ability to use Korean language.

KCI등재

5보조용언 '보다' 구성의 사용 양상 연구 - 언어 사용역에 따른 형태, 의미, 담화 기능을 중심으로 -

저자 : 홍혜란 ( Hong Hyeran )

발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회 간행물 : 문법교육 42권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 131-163 (33 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This study examines the practical use of the construction of the auxiliary verb '보다' based on corpus analysis. To this end, the corpus composed of academic prose, newspapers, fiction, and spoken was constructed, and the use of the construction of the auxiliary verb '보다' in the four language registers was analyzed in terms of morphology, semantics, and discourse.
The study results were as follows: First, morphologically, the construction of the auxiliary verb '보다' were combined with endings such as '-(으)ㄴ가', '-는가', '-나', '-(으)ㄹ까', '-고', '-다(가)' and '-아/어'. Second, semantically, the construction of the auxiliary verb '보다' means 'try', 'experience', 'assume', 'guess', ' awareness', 'worry', 'withhold judgment', 'intention', and 'reason', and the proportion of the meaning of 'try' was overwhelmingly high. Third, discourse functions such as 'euphemistic argument', 'warning/threat', 'sarcastic comment', 'scolding', 'self-reproach', and 'resolution' were realized in discourse levels. This meaning is not the original meaning of the auxiliary verb '보다', but a newly added meaning by combining the grammatical meaning and the auxiliary verb composition with the context in which it is used.

1
권호별 보기

내가 찾은 최근 검색어

최근 열람 자료

맞춤 논문

보관함

내 보관함
공유한 보관함

1:1문의

닫기