간행물

한국EU학회> Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies

Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies update

  • : 한국EU학회
  • : 사회과학분야  >  경제학
  • :
  • :
  • : 연속간행물
  • : 반년간
  • : 1598-8902
  • :
  • :

수록정보
수록범위 : 1권1호(2003)~20권2호(2022) |수록논문 수 : 194
Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies
20권2호(2022년 12월) 수록논문
최근 권호 논문
| | | |

1
표지

저자 : 한국EU학회

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 1-1 (1 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

키워드 보기
초록보기

저자 : 한국EU학회

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 1-1 (1 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

키워드 보기
초록보기

저자 : Stephen Day

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 1-24 (24 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

Despite the ascribed constitutional role that foresees the European Political Parties (Europarties) as an integral part of the European Union's representative democracy, they continue to remain peripheral figures. While the cumulative effect of legal initiatives has been to enhance their day-to-day operational performance, this has yet to translate into a transformative impact where they are viewed as key players in the EU's political system. As a result, the Europarties remain in a weakened state where they find themselves caught up in repetitive debates about what needs to be done. At the heart of that impasse is the relationship between the Europarties and their National Member Parties (NMPs) who tend to display an attitude of resistance and indifference towards them. However, although NMPs often seek to dilute and limit the impact of specific types of transnational practice that are viewed as a sine qua non for strengthening the Europarties, they do not seek to completely shut down debates or prevent more limited types of transnational practice from being enacted.

저자 : Bongchul Kim , Minsub Shim

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 25-35 (11 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

Brexit will bring great changes to EU and British society, and it will shock the legal systems of both sides. The withdrawal agreement and Britain's domestic law to implement it have set up devices to absorb the impact of the legal system. Brexit is not just a problem within the EU, it also affects third countries. Korea is making efforts to adapt quickly to changes caused by Brexit and prepared for shocks by signing the Korea-UK FTA at an appropriate time. Although the purpose of the Korea-UK FTA is to adapt to the Brexit phenomenon and maintain the existing preferential treatment based on the Korea-EU FTA, the Korea-UK FTA already has some differences from the existing standards of the Korea-EU FTA, and there is a possibility that new standards of discipline will emerge depending on future negotiations and needs of the two partner countries. The future Korea- UK FTA will be quite different from the Korea-EU FTA, and other international laws establishing and regulating relations between Korea and the UK will also change. There are negative assessments and predictions of changes in norms applied to bilateral relations, but ultimately, the two countries need an active attitude to respond appropriately and quickly to changes.

저자 : Tomohiro Fukuda

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 37-54 (18 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This paper analyzes EU financial management reform and discusses its contribution to accountability and legitimacy in European governance. By examining the underlying scheme and consequences of the reform and interinstitutional relations in the negotiations over the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), this article describes the relative success of reform after the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL). The MFF was originally introduced as a softgovernance arrangement in the New Public Management reform. But the ToL modified the status of the MFF, strengthening the negotiating leverage of the European Parliament in multiannual budgetary process, which caused a strenuous interinstitutional battle. However, the community institutions engaged in constructive discussions on MFF 2021-2027, and the European Commission's attempt to enhance inclusiveness resulted in punctual adoption. Throughout the reform, the Commission secured process appropriateness and enhanced political accountability, upholding throughput legitimacy.

저자 : Yoo-duk Kang

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 55-78 (24 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

This study reviews the determinants of intra-European Union (EU) labour movement, with a focus on income and business cycle factors, and conducts an empirical analysis of intra-EU migration for the period 2000-2016. It is commonly argued that labour migration between member states of the EU has been mainly driven by income or wage differences between countries and differences in business cycle such as unemployment do not explain intra-EU migration pattern. Our findings show that business cycle factors do provide a good explanation of intra-EU migration, while higher-income countries still tend to attract more migrants. Intra-EU migration has been increasingly driven by the difference in unemployment during the post-crisis and recovery periods. The remaining question is whether this finding is related to the structural changes in the European-wide labour market. It will be necessary for the EU and member states to address more structural obstacles to intra-EU labour mobility so that the latter can work as an additional adjustment channel.

저자 : César De Prado

발행기관 : 한국EU학회 간행물 : Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 20권 2호 발행 연도 : 2022 페이지 : pp. 79-98 (20 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

Throughout several decades and different world power structures, the European Union (EU) has always been the strongest supporter of multilateralism in Europe and globally, but it has recently taken a strategic turn. Meanwhile, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has patiently developed a unique practice of strategic multilateralism. In the 20th century, it gradually increased its presence and activities in the United Nations (UN) and other multilateral regimes generally constructed by Western powers. With the new century it also started to promote Sinocentric processes focused on development. Nowadays, in our complex world characterised by greater power rivalry, the PRC is trying to conduct a partial revision of the Western multilateral order while enhancing Sinocentric processes with greater thematic and geographic reach. However, there are still windows of opportunity for the EU to collaborate and compete with the PRC in economic and security domains, and perhaps even in transforming the UN into a more effective governance regime.

1
권호별 보기

내가 찾은 최근 검색어

최근 열람 자료

맞춤 논문

보관함

내 보관함
공유한 보관함

1:1문의

닫기