간행물

한국화법학회> 화법연구

화법연구 update

Korean Speech and Discourse Analysis

  • : 한국화법학회
  • : 어문학분야  >  기타제어문
  • : KCI등재
  • :
  • : 연속간행물
  • : 계간
  • : 1598-9542
  • : 2713-881X
  • :

수록정보
수록범위 : 1권0호(1999)~54권0호(2021) |수록논문 수 : 394
화법연구
54권0호(2021년 11월) 수록논문
최근 권호 논문
| | | |

KCI등재

1고부 대화에 나타난 여성결혼이민자의 한국어 화용적 실패 양상 연구

저자 : 김지현 ( Kim¸ Jihyun ) , 전은주 ( Jeon¸ Eunju )

발행기관 : 한국화법학회 간행물 : 화법연구 54권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 1-46 (46 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

The purpose of this study is to examine the aspects of Korean pragmatic failure of female married immigrants in the conversation between mothers-in law and daughters-in law. It also aims to suggest a Korean language education for female married immigrants through a survey of the appropriateness of Korean native speakers. The lack of pragmatic competence of female married immigrants leads to pragmatic failure in conversation between mothers-in law and daughters-in law, which can lead to conflict between them. Therefore, in order to improve the pragmatic competence of female married immigrants, it is necessary to conduct research about the aspects of Korean pragmatic failure of female married immigrants. This study redefined the term 'pragmatic failure' which has been discussed in existing Korean language education. It also, examined the aspects of Korean pragmatic failure of female married immigrants in the conversation between mothers-in law and daughters-in law in the televised program < EBS damunhwa gobuyeoljeon >. This study also conducted a survey on the recognition of appropriateness of Korean native speakers. Based on the results of the study, it suggests the direction of Korean language education so that female married immigrants can communicate with their mothers-in-law without being misunderstood.

KCI등재

2디지털 네이티브 세대를 위한 대학 토론수업의 방향 모색

저자 : 신희선 ( Shin¸ Heesun ) , 서정혁 ( Seo¸ Jeong-hyok ) , 황영미 ( Hwang¸ Youngmee ) , 김지윤 ( Kim¸ Ji-yoon )

발행기관 : 한국화법학회 간행물 : 화법연구 54권 0호 발행 연도 : 2021 페이지 : pp. 47-99 (53 pages)

다운로드

(기관인증 필요)

초록보기

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, on-line education was proceeded in full swing. Thus, changes were inevitable in the class of < Critical Thinking and Debate > which operated through students' presentations and actual practices. This research contemplates the direction of university debate education in the digital era, especially based upon students' opinions about “online debate practice” and the opening of “intensified curriculum.” This was done using surveys related with the < Critical Thinking and Debate Class > which was operated as an S-women's university's obligatory general education course. This research suggested the aggressive utilization of digital contents and the necessity of customized education for each learner in future debate classes considering the change of educational environment and the presence of new students.
Under a full scale online classes with no restrictions on the time and space, this research claimed the necessity of strengthening the network between a professor and a learner and their communication. It also asserts to build up a real/non-real cooperative learning system. In order to strengthen the learner's curiosity and accessibility, this research emphasized that the class should critically use various contents like YouTube video clips, soap operas in Netflix, and movies. The class also needs to be operated through an online-based participating platform where students' various activities are easily available.
It suggested the following actions as a direction for debate education in the digital era: (1), development and internalization of a step by step teaching and learning module for the learner-centered debate education; (2), institutionalization of a debate clinic with a professor's role of tutor, coach, and curator for debate education; (3), development of micro contents and aggressive utilization of digital contents; (4), intensification of the communication track for continued debate education; (5), and establishment of online debate education model. With these, I'd like to contemplate the direction of a university's critical thinking and debate education while reflecting "the digital difference" in the digital era.

1
권호별 보기

내가 찾은 최근 검색어

최근 열람 자료

맞춤 논문

보관함

내 보관함
공유한 보관함

1:1문의

닫기