In this study, we analyzed the methodological quality of meta-analysis studies in the field of exercise interventions for older women using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool. The SPSS 21.0 program was used to process the data of the research results. Specifically, descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, Fleiss' kappa analysis, and Mann-Whitney U test were performed. The research results are as follows: First, we examined the characteristics of the research data, including type of paper, number of authors, publication year, research topic, study material inclusion, number of research topics, and availability of research funding. Second, looking at the methodological quality evaluation scores of meta-analysis studies related to exercise interventions for elderly women and the level of each evaluation tool, the average score ranged from a minimum of 2.17 to a maximum of 9.33. The number of missing critical questions varied from a minimum of three to a maximum of six. Therefore, all seven studies received a very low quality rating. Third, no statistically significant differences were found in the level of methodological quality according to study characteristics of meta-analysis studies related to exercise interventions for elderly women.