This essay provides a critical examination of affective realities in the late modern neoliberal era, where neoliberalism delineates the concept of freedom. It employs the theoretical frameworks of queerness and affect as primary tools for illuminating the radical possibilities of freedom against neoliberal appropriation. The essay begins by tracing the confinement of freedom into anxiety within the neoliberal landscape, revealing the reactionary affective politics produced through the politics of ressentiment and the pursuit of the good life. Subsequently, it explores the significance of queer politics and critiques as a means of resistance against neoliberal governmentality. It underscores the inherent tension within queerness, arising from its indefinable nature and historical contingency. Furthermore, this essay investigates the imbrication of queer critiques with affective reading, framing it as a form of weak theory. This understanding of affective queer reading reframes freedom as a rallying point amidst neoliberal affective governmentality, prompting a reevaluation of politics as a process of world-making, intricately linked with the practice of affective reading and the pursuit of political freedom. In conclusion, this exploration of queer affective politics underscores the potential for multifaceted readings of differences, which suggests that the pursuit of freedom as an act of critique remains viable amidst the pervasive influence of neoliberalism.