18.97.14.91
18.97.14.91
close menu
Accredited
그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석
Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction
최영완 ( Choi Young-wan ) , 김영주 ( Kim Young-joo )
농촌계획 vol. 25 iss. 4 77-86(10pages)
DOI 10.7851/ksrp.2019.25.4.077
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2021-500-000660954

The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze the operating state and characteristics of domestic and foreign green care, prioritize the facilities and programs for green care introduction through expert survey of importance, and thereby to provide a basic material for introducing green care in facilities in Rural Development Project districts, including domestic rural experience facilities. Domestic and foreign literature was analyzed in order to classify the necessary facilities programs, of green care, and the analysis results were modified and supplemented through Expert Delphi Survey. Based on the results, AHP based importance survey was conducted. In terms of the facilities and programs for green care introduction, necessary facilities (H/W) were categorized into four types (accommodation facility, resting facility, experience facility, therapy facility) and S/W programs into three types (learning experience type, therapy type, and care type). To verify the reliability of the AHP based importance survey, Consistency Index (C.I.) was analyzed. As a result, the C.I. value of nine respondents ranged from 0.000 to 0.083 so that the survey was found to have high consistency. The importance of S/W programs was 0.627, and that of H/W facilities was 0.373. For green care introduction, programs were found to be more important. Regarding the categories of necessary facilities, therapy facility had the highest value, or 0.348; experience facility 0.253; accommodation facility 0.211; resting facility 0.188. Therefore, therapy facility and experience facility were found to be important. In case of S/W programs, therapy type had the highest value, or 0.499, and learning experience type (0.255) and care type (0.246) were similarly important. Generally, the categories that had high importance values tended to show a remarkable difference in importance of their sub categories. In particular, facilities or therapy programs using natural ecology and forests were found to be highly important. In conclusion, it is required to actively review the introduction of active programs using resources, such as existing experience facilities and accommodation facilities and villages forests, and programs making the body and soul comfortable, such as natural ecology experience, Green Shower, and horticulture activity.

I. 서 론
II. 연구내용 및 방법
III. 그린케어 유형분류
IV. 그린케어 도입 필요시설과 프로그램 중요도 평가결과
V. 결 론
References
[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×