本論文은 都市大學生의 餘暇時間과 餘暇實態를 把握코자 1971년 3 월부터 1972년 4월 25일에 걸쳐 서울市內 28개 大學 및 大學校 (男子大學 및 大學校 21개교, 女子大學 및 大學校 7개교)의 男女大學生 1,000名을 對象으로 하여 그들의 生活分析을 中心으로 一日 生活時間, 餘暇時間, 餘暇時間과 關聯된 要因, 餘暇活動의 實態, 餘暇活動과 關聯된 要因을 平日ㆍ土曜日ㆍ日曜日로 區分하여 이를 다시 性別ㆍ專攻 系別 (人文社會系, 自然理工系)學年別ㆍ非아르바이트 學生과 아르바이트 學生別로 調査分析하고, 餘暇活動에 대한 大學生의 評價와 反應도 아울러 調査하였다. 調査方法은 서울特別市의 男女大學 및 大學校를 대상으로 性別, 專攻別로 나누어 4個層으로 層化하고 層別로 한 集落(duster) 의 크기 (size) 를 20~25名이 되도록 調整하였다. 層別 抽出率을 F₁= F₂ = F₃ = F₄로 하였고 다음에 각 集落에서 약 1 / 2，즉 f₁ =f₂ =f₃ =f₄ = 1 / 2 = f 로 하여, 결국 二階層化 集落抽出法 (stratified two stage cluster sampling method)에 依據하였다. 그리고 本 調査 硏究는 文獻硏究와 質問紙法을 사용하였으며, 質問紙의 構成은 55項目으로서 平日, 土曜日, 日曜日 全體的 質問, 여름ㆍ겨울放學, 背景質問로 하였다. 質問書 應答 및 回收方法은 應答 時間에 制限을 두지 않았으나 대체적으로 所要時間을 50분 정도로 하고 調査員 20名이 각 對象大學으로 가서 이를 實施하고 回收하였다. 質問書 1,000부를 1971년 6월 15일~ 1971년 7월 5일 사이에 配布하였으며, 그 配布部數 중 936部 (93. 6%)를 回收하고 擇一型의 原則에서 벗어난 것 또는 두 개 이상의 設問에 答한 것 背景質問에 答하지 않은 것은 모두 除外하였던 바, 完全하고 正確한 應答을 한 것은 924枚 였으며 調査結果는 아래와 같다.

The present thesis is a survey of a thousand college and university students form 28 institutions in Seoul on the leisure time and their leisure activities with the questionnaire of 55 items administered between April and July 1971 and which were seperately analized for (1) weekdays, (2) Saturdays, and (3) Sundays. The selection of students was based on two stage stratified cluster sampling technique with such variables as sex and major(Science VS. non Science fields)as the major classifying criteria. A thousand copies of the questionaire were distributed in the period between June 15, 1971 and July 5, 1971. Among them 936 sheets (93.6%) were resumed, but some sheets which made two or more answers wers at the choose-one request were all removed. and then 924 sheets were left behind at length. The result of examination is as follws: I. Leisure time 1) The leisure time of the college students is about 4 hours and 52 minutes average on a week day which covers 20.3% of the daily activities and approximately the same proportion as of class work a day. Especially Staurday marks leisure time of 8 hours and 6 minutes which covers 33.8% of the daily activities and Sunday marks 11 hours and 37 minutes which covers 48.4% 2) The variable in sex, academic years. majors. employment and the amount of money available shows remarkable corresponding variances in the availability of leisure time and its use. II. Status of Leisure activities 1) College student’s leisure activities in the home show limits of "reading papers of magazines" and "enjoying the radio. TV or music". It seems that they enjoy no more than the passive leisure activities dependent much in the Masscom. 2) A response to "going home immediatly after class" shows 43.2%(male, 37.5% and female, 54.8%) It tells a large part of students doesn’t participate in the extracurricular activities are covered only with "circle activity" (participating rate, 13.9%) and "enjoying sports" (participating rate 5.8%). 3) The leisure activities of Saturday show that "to meet friends" (32.6%) and "to have a date" or " to go to tearoom" are the main activities. Those of Sunday show that "to meet friends" (40.9%) and "to go hiking" (19.8%) are the main parts. 4) The leisure activities in the summer and winter vacations show various aspects. In summer "going to seashore", "traveling," "service activities", "climbing," reading", "fishing," "driving practice" and the likes are involves. The contents of those activities are open to everybody, active and constructive, and are different from those of school terms. In winter "reading," "skating," "climbing", "traveling," "collecting and hobby," "hunting," "service activities," and "skiing" are involved, and those activities are made up with the nature’s characteristic scenery of the winter. It is observed that such activities examined above consist chiefly of outdoor activities in the nature. 5) The difference in academic years and in majors for both sexes did not produce statistically signifi cant difference at 0.01 level(X² test) in their leisure activities. However, it is interesting to note that the sex variance when collectively considered made significant difference 0.01 level. III. Evaluation of and response to the leisure activities 1) Most of the college students spend their leisure time in the passive manner, but they don’t feel so much interested in that; otherwise they are looking for the interests in such vigorous activities as climbing, spots, travel. And to the question what they hope under the circumstances permitted, the first of all, travel is prevalent with man and woman students together and driving, horse riding, climbing, and sports which would provide speed or thrill for them, and the circle activities are following it. 2) To the question of feeling pleasure in the leisure activities 60% of response is shown, and to that of gaining interest from the leisure activities 74.7% is responeded. It means that they complely worth pursuing. 3) The leisure activities are evaluated on the points of the mental and psychological effects; of the development of social characters as well as formation and improvement of human-relationship; of wise use of leisure time and of improving efficiency. 4) The negative response which couldn’ expect to be provided with any interests is attributed to "spending much money" “making trouble in study:’ “not pleased with it,” “not interested in it” and the likes. Answers to the question on the factors which impede the leisure activities are “no spare time”, “no equipments of facilities for the leisure activities’’, no knowledge of method or skill for leisure activities. By the examination of such factors or causes impedemental to the leisure activities following clues are found out: 1. They don’t have any appropriate idea to use the time wisely. 2. There lacks in facilities for the leisure activities. 3. They are lacking in knowledge, skill, methods, habitual attitude toward leisure activities. 4. They misunderstand that the leisure activities take large expenses. These clues will be presented in the main conclusion and meet a remarkable challenge in the field of leisure time and leisure activities.