The purpose of this research was to find out the effect of differing forms of KR provision on motor learning as a function of age. To validate the effects of forms of KR provision, the following hypotheses are raised. 1. If a form of KR provision is applied to two different age groups, it exibits different motor learning effects. 2. If a form of KR provision is applied of motor learning effects are same. To test the hypotheses, thirty elementary school girls and thirty women`s university students were tested in a 3×2×20 factorial design with repeated measures on the last factor. Subjects were randomly assigned to three different KR presentation conditions(Auditory, Graphic, Numeric). Subject were given 20 blocks of 5 trials in the acquisition phase with 10 trials of retention test after twenty minutes of retention interval. Three-way ANOVA with repeated-measures on block was used for statistical analyses along with Scheff test for post hoc analyses. The results showed that only at retenion phase, two groups exibited different motor learning effects. As the forms of KR provision does not 5% sign level have consistent effect on two different groups, the first hypothesis is not accepted. Conclusively it is found that motor learning is not influenced by KR provision.