닫기
18.97.14.91
18.97.14.91
close menu
}
Accredited
한강수계에서의 부유사 예측을 위한 LOADEST 모형의 회귀식의 평가
Evaluation of Regression Models in LOADEST to Estimate Suspended Solid Load in Hangang Waterbody
박윤식 ( Park Youn Shik ) , 이지민 ( Lee Ji Min ) , 정영훈 ( Jung Younghun ) , 신민환 ( Shin Min Hwan ) , 박지형 ( Park Ji Hyung ) , 황하선 ( Hwang Hasun ) , 류지철 ( Ryu Jichul ) , 박장호 ( Park Jangho ) , 김기성 ( Kim Ki-sung )
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2018-500-003775037

Typically, water quality sampling takes place intermittently since sample collection and following analysis requires substantial cost and efforts. Therefore regression models (or rating curves) are often used to interpolate water quality data. LOADEST has nine regression models to estimate water quality data, and one regression model needs to be selected automatically or manually. The nine regression models in LOADEST and auto-selection by LOADEST were evaluated in the study. Suspended solids data were collected from forty-nine stations from the Water Information System of the Ministry of Environment. Suspended solid data from each station was divided into two groups for calibration and validation. Nash-Stucliffe efficiency (NSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were used to evaluate estimated suspended solid loads. The regression models numbered 1 and 3 in LOADEST provided higher NSE and R2, compared to the other regression models. The regression modes numbered 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9 in LOADEST provided low NSE. In addition, the regression model selected by LOADEST did not necessarily provide better suspended solid estimations than the other regression models did.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×