This study aims to compare the ease of shirt patterns in the men’s wear market that have been constantly developing, and to analyze the fitness and appearance through the 3D virtual try-on system· The study selected three industrial patterns and two educational materials of classic-fit and slim-fit shirts for a total of ten items· The experiments involved virtual wearing, a stress·contact point·perspective map, and appearance evaluations· First, the ease differed significantly in the chest, waist, and sleeve cap height according to the patterns· Second, based on the stress, contact point, and transparency, there was ease in the order of Nam, D-brand, J-brand, Park, and S-brand in the classic-fit shirts while the order of D-brand, Nam, J-brand, Park, and S-brand resulted in the slim-fit shirts· Third, in the appearance evaluation, higher points resulted in the order of J-brand, Park, S-brand, D-brand, and Nam in both classic-fit and slim-fit· The results showed that proper ease differs greatly by shirt-fit and target age· Also, the shirts with more ease tended to be evaluated less favorably in the appearance evaluation· Based on the results, the study suggests that the proper ease in chest circumference is 18cm for the classic-fit shirts and 6cm for the slim-fit shirts·