The Reform of the Centuriate Assembly in the Light of the Tabula Hebana and the Tribal Assembly Kang, Sung-Gil This paper aims to reconsider the reform of the centuriate assembly(Comitia Centuriata) in the light of the Tabula Hebana and the tribal assembly(Comitia Tributa). My main points are as follows. First, it seems certain that Augustus`s resolve to cling to and to revive Republican forms extended to his plans for procedure in the select assembly(comitia) responsible for destinatio in the Tabula Hebana. Second, I suggest that voting method by which the senators and equites voted into the fifteen large urns each in the Tabula Hebana would be same as that by which the 280 junior centuries(iuniores) and senior centuries(seniores) of the five classes voted into the 170 urns(voting centuries) each in the reformed centuriate assembly. If my suggestion is right, the voting procedure in the tribal assembly would be introduced for the voting of five classes in the reformed centuriate assembly. As any one tribe among 35 tribes for voting of five classes each was drawn by lot, iuniores in each class from that tribe would approach their urn and cast their vote; when they have cast their vote in this way and returned, then seniores in each class from same tribe would approach the same urn or other urn and cast their vote. This voting method in reformed centuriate assembly is the voting by the tribes that Appian remarked in the his Bellum Civilium, I. 59. Third, I suggest that the second class had 35 centuries; the third and fourth classes had 20 centuries each; the fifth class had 25 centuries. In conclusion, I suggest that as compared with the voting by the centuries in Servian centuriate assembly, the voting in the reformed centuriate assembly would be by the tribes.