1931年滿州で始まった日本のアジア太平洋戰爭は日本の帝國(本土, 植民地, 占領地域など) 全域の人的·物的資源を動員した總動員戰爭であった。4千萬人に至る東アジアと太平洋の民衆が戰爭に卷き入まれ、食糧と鑛物から□と醫樂品に至るまですべての物資が動員された。このすべての事は國家總動員法と國民徵用領など關係法令によって遂行された日本國家權力による公式的な行爲であった。年間人員800萬名餘(慰安婦除外)が帝國全域(朝鮮半島,中國,サハリン,日本,東南アジア,太平洋)に動員され、朝鮮半島で戰爭遂行のための物資生産作業場、鐵道と道路、軍需施設物など關連作業場は7千餘個所に達する。戰爭に動員されない朝鮮の民衆たちは楊□な供出品目を滿たさなければならなかった。動員主觀者(總督府管理、區長など)は動員のための政策遂行及び宣전を擔當した。結局、日本のアジア太平洋戰爭と言うのは朝鮮半島のすべての民衆たちが經驗した共通の歷史であると同時に彼らが初めて經驗した近代戰爭である總動員戰爭であっt。しかしこれらの經驗は植民地の歷史の中で記錄(口述)と敍事へつながりにくかった。20世紀を支配した``植民地民だったから當然味わう痛み``であったという社會的共感は彼らの口を防ぐ役目をした。1965年韓日協定締結以後、政治的に自分たちの權利を要求できなかった雰危機も一助した。21世紀に入って政府次元の調査が始まって、地域社會次元の硏究が進行され、關心は高くなったが生存者に接することが難しくなったという問題が發生した。日本のアジア太平洋戰爭に動員された被害の經驗は民族問題と階級問題を包括している。したがって、彼らの經驗を發話につながるようにするためには經驗の特性に對する社會的な理解が必要である。現在、硏究者たちに彼らの經驗を전えられる經驗當事者は非常に少ない。家族は當事者の經驗を理解できないとか共有する部分がほとんどない。なので、現在やるべきことは熱情的な口述採錄ではなく、今まで收集した資料に對する惱みと省察である。アジア太平洋戰爭に動員された勞務者たちの經驗を發話につなげ、敍事化する理由は何か。これに對する惱みの過程と自ら得た解答が今後の敍事化方向及び硏究方法に重要な指針になるであろう。そのためにこの文では第一に强制動員被害者(アジア太平洋戰爭に動員された朝鮮人勞務者)らが經驗した經驗の特性を土台で發話が持つ意味及び特性を見て、第二に敍事化及び硏究方向を提示した。硏究方向は三である。第一、帝國史觀點で理解する必要がある。アジア太平洋戰爭を植民地朝鮮の靑年だけではなく東アジア民衆が一緖に經驗した總動員戰爭の經驗として接近する必要がある。第二, 戰時體制期を韓國戰爭など韓國現代史と連携した統合的な觀點の硏究である。そのためには地域事例硏究が望ましい。特定地域の社會經濟的實態(人口變化、强制動員現況、所在地作業場リスト、産業實態)に基づいて强制動員の經驗者たちが以後地域社會で生活しながら經驗した韓國現代史を見る硏究である。第三、口述を中心に多楊な資料を活用する硏究である。文獻資料は勿論、映像物(映畵、ドラマなど)と寫眞など非文獻資料、新聞と雜誌などメディア資料を總體的に活用する硏究方法が必要である。

The Asia-Pacific War began in 1931 in Manchurian incident which was the war of the human general mobilization to bring the resources to the whole area of the Japanese empire (including the mainland, colony, occupation area). There are 40 million people from East Asia and the Pacific were drawn into a war, and all the supply of goods was mobilized including food, mineral, salt and medical supplies. It was the official transaction by the power of the state of Japan to perform by the legislation of the General Mobilization and laws and the command for the regulation of the requisition. Over 8 million(exclude the comfort women) are mobilized in the whole empire(the Korean Peninsula, China, Sakhalin, Japan, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific) by yearly. And there are over 7,000 workshops and places in Korea which are relevant to the war to produce goods, railroad, road, and munitionsfacilities. Peoples who have not been drawn into a war and workplaces still had to offer the various items. The supervisor of the mobilization(including governor-general`s office management, the head of a ward) was in charge of the conducting the policy for the mobilization and promulgate. The Asia-Pacific War is the primal experience to Koreans as a modern warfare and also the war of the general mobilization as a common history to everyone which had been through together in Korean peninsula. However, it was difficult to keep records during this period of the colony. Because of the bond of sympathy developed between people of the 20th century so people naturally thought this is unavoidable pain and it stopped people`s mouth. And also the atmosphere of this period was not able to demand their rights so it contributes to the agreement after the conclusion politically on 1965 KoreaJapan treaty. Turn into the 21st century the government has begun the study and thereis a rising interest on studying community dimension which was in progress however running against a stump with contact to survivors. The experience of damage mobilized in the Asia-Pacific War contains a racial problem and the issue of classes. Therefore, the social understanding for the characteristic of the experience is necessary to lead to utterance their experiences. There are very few people who can transmission of their experiences to people. Even the families of the experienced could not understand or share the experiences of them. What we should focus on now is the documentswhich we collected for the past few year rather than oral transcription. Why we keep asking people to give testimony of their experiences and take records as it come? This is because it will become the guideline for the direction and study methods thru the process of getting an answer. Therefore I would like to focus on the meanings and characters of the utterance firstly and the next is proposing the description and way of study. The way of study needed are three. First, need to understand from the viewpointof the empire. It needsto approach from a standpoint that experience of the general mobilization war that not only for the Korean but also for the East Asia people in the Asia-PacificWar. Secondly, it is the study of the integrated point of view that cooperated with Korean contemporary history including the Korean War in 1950-1953. It is desired for a case-study for this study. This is a study to watch the Korean contemporary history that people experienced while people forced to mobilization to live a life based on the socioeconomic state(i.e. population change, the current states of forced mobilization workshops and workplaces, and industry situation) of the particular area afterward in a community. It is a study to utilize a variety of documents mainly on the third as an oral statement. Documentsas well as media references (including a movie, the drama) and the media document like the non-documents including the photographs, newspapers and the magazines generally is necessary.