닫기
216.73.216.28
216.73.216.28
close menu
경추 손상 환자에서 전산화 단층 촬영 시행을 위한 임상적 기준: NEXUS 기준과 Canadian cervical spine rule
NEXUS and the Canadian Cervical Spine Rule as a Screening Tool for Computed Tomography Evaluation in Patients with Cervical Spine Injury경추 손상 환자에서 전산화 단층 촬영 시행을 위한 임상적 기준: NEXUS 기준과 Canadian cervical spine rule
최양환 ( Yang Hwan Choi ) , 조준호 ( Jun Ho Cho ) , 좌민홍 ( Min Hong Choa ) , 박유석 ( Yoo Seok Park ) , 정현수 ( Hyun Soo Chung ) , 정성필 ( Sung Pil Chung )
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2009-510-008728713

Purpose: National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria and the Canadian Cervical Spine rule (CCR) are commonly used in cervical trauma patients to determine whether a plain cervical X-ray should be performed. However, plain cervical X-rays are so inaccurate that cervical spine computed tomography (CT) is often considered as a screening test. We studied the usefulness of the NEXUS criteria and the CCR for determining the need for a CT evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from January 2007 to March 2008. Plain X-ray and CT scans of the cervical spine were performed on blunt trauma patients with neck pain. The relevancy of CT was examined using the NEXUS criteria and the CCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value analyses were performed to diagnose the cervical spine injury. Results: During the study period, 284 patients were enrolled in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value of the NEXUS criteria were 87.5%, 1.1%, 5.0%, and 60.0% respectively, while those of the CCR were 87.5%, 8.2%, 5.3%, and 91.6%. There were two missed fracture cases when the NEXUS criteria and the CCR were applied independently, however, no cases were missed when both were applied. Conclusion: This study suggests the NEXUS and the CCR in combination can be used as a guide to CT evaluation for cervical spine injury in the ED.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×