18.190.160.6
18.190.160.6
close menu
KCI 등재
심포지엄 : 미학에 있어서 재현의 문제 ; 재현의 위기론의 타당성과 한계
The Validity and its Limitation on the "Crisis of Representation"
이도흠 ( Do Heum Lee )
미학예술학연구 22권 125-156(32pages)
DOI 10.15727/JASA.22.0.05
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2009-600-008491696

The ``crisis of representationt`` has become a commonplace of cultural, philosophical, semiotic, and art theory during the last decades of the twentieth century. Art theorists, postmodern philosophers, cultural critics, media theorists, and poststructuralist semioticians are discussing the crisis of representation. In a world of delusions, illusions, simulacra, and virtual realities, as well as constructed realities and deconstructed textualities, the means of representation, the signs, seem to dissolve and become autonomous semiotic agents in the ongoing process of infinite semiosis. The crisis of representation is a world in which signs have lost their power to represent anything. Words become deprived of their referents, images are no longer anchored in reality. Texts begin to lose their structural autonomy and ramify in a network of hypertextualities. Signs can only be signs in opposition to other signs, and representation is not the representation of the world, but the representation of difference between signs. However, representation does not mean the mere repetition of a previous sign phenomenon. Instead, it always involves a difference from what precedes(as a sign or a referent), and it is the dynamics of the effect of this difference which result in what Peirce calls ``the growth of signs.`` A reality is a sort of illusion or interpretation. Our real world is a global communication network which mingles the real and the fictional. We have difficulties in differentiating between two more and more. However, a reality is a field that being do an event, confronting with world and recociling with the others after realizing infinite and mutual networking. Representing a reality, it is distorted by the power, ideology, form, image and sign. But a truth is not in text itself but in the process of interpretation. We can find the lower edge of truth through the interpretation of cham. The original disappeared. Virtual realities and hyper-realities substitute for a realities. However, both virtuality and reality are two way of being. We must realize that the existence of matrix is man`s natural existence.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×