The purpose of this article is to reconsider and criticize the way of the western thinking about music by the concept of Musicking. In the thinking way of the western classical music, there is a tendency to consider music as musical works. It means that music is considered not to be related with activity of people but to be autonomous things or objects themselves. Christopher Small criticize this tendency is the habit of thinking in abstraction, which is seperated from an action and process what people do. This is the fallacy of reification which has originated from the fault of western thinking since Plato. This idea, that musical meaning exists uniquely in musical objects, accompanys a few relating ideas. First, musical performance plays no part in the creative process. Second, a musical performance is thought of as a one way system of communication that has no interaction between listeners and performers. Third, each musical work is an autonomous thing that is no relationship with any ritual, religious, political, or social beliefs. However, if we widen our attention to the entire set of relationships that constitutes a performance, the fundamental nature and meaning of music would lie not in objects, but in action what people do. So, in this viewpoint, `Musicking` it is focused not on the musical works but on the musical events related with the question, "What`s going on here?" This transition of our attention from music to musicking means that we pay our attention to process and relationship as a whole, from making music through performance to listening as a whole.