18.221.167.11
18.221.167.11
close menu
KCI 등재
기관지유발검사 시행과 해석: 전문가 의견서
The KAAACI Standardization Committee Report on the procedure and application of the bronchial provocation tests
임경환 ( Kyung-hwan Lim ) , 김민혜 ( Min-hye Kim ) , 양민석 ( Min-suk Yang ) , 송우정 ( Woo-jung Song ) , 정재우 ( Jae-woo Jung ) , 이정민 ( Jeongmin Lee ) , 서동인 ( Dong In Suh ) , 신유섭 ( Yoo Seob Shin ) , 권재우 ( Jae-woo Kwon ) , 김세훈 ( Sae-hoon Kim ) , 김상헌 ( Sang-heon Kim ) ,
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2018-500-004109255

Bronchial provocation tests are of value in the evaluation of airway hyperresponsiveness. Nonspecific bronchial challenge (methacholine, mannitol, exercise, etc.) is used when the symptoms, physical examination, and measurements of pulmonary function are unremarkable in the diagnosis of asthma, when a patient is suspected of having occupational asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), and when a screening test for asthma or EIB is required for some occupational groups in whom bronchospasm would pose an unacceptable hazard. Methacholine inhalation challenge is most widely used pharmacologic challenge and highly sensitive. For appropriate interpretation of the results of methacholine provocation, it is important to perform the test with the standardized protocol and to recognize that inhalation methods significantly influence the sensitivity of the procedure. Indirect challenges (e.g., mannitol and exercise) correlate with airway inflammation and are more specific but less sensitive for asthma. Indirect provocation tests are used to confirm asthma, to differentiate asthma from other airway diseases, and to evaluate EIB. (Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2018;6:14-25)

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×